Friday, September 03, 2010
Construction
Forums

Design Build Construction Comes of Age, By Default

Posted in: Construction Management
By William Graves
Nov 28, 2009 - 9:18:42 PM
Design/Build has been around for years, milenia actually, but during the past century of building it has played only a minor role. Frequently, during the past couple of decades articles would herald that the Design/Build delivery system was about to become mainstream. It never really happened.

Design/Build has been embraced for infrastructure projects and has gained significant market share in select market segments, but for commercial and institutional work it has remained on the sidelines.

Although each year Design/Build has made gains in acceptance, it just never reached the tipping point. I believe that day may finally be here, but not for the conventional reasons touted by the industry.

The usual rationale for Design/Build include faster turn around time and single source responsibility, these are both accurate and solid arguments that make sense. Every Design/Build project I have built was predicated on the need for speed. We've produced remarkable projects within timeframes that were simply not possible through conventional delivery systems. I believe however, that there are two primary factors that will finally allow Design/Build to play a significant role as a conventional delivery system. These factors are related to the current economy and the ever increasing complexity of our industry.

The commercial and institutional building industry is in a tail spin. Projects are selling for 25-35% below where they were 2 years ago. So far the cost reductions have been achieved by cutting the overhead and profit down the supply chain to zero. I also see jobs bid for what I know has to be less than cost, possibly by as much as 10%. That's a problem for the obvious reasons, but it may also be a harbinger for deflation. Since I have not seen material cost soften, the only way to bridge losses on projects like this is through wage reductions or cheating. Poor options that encourage attrition of experienced professionals and drastically increase risk for owners, GC's and sub-contractors.

These remain difficult times for contractors; if the lending pipelines don't open soon this industry will experience radical change, much more than tweaks in delivery systems. Many of the bids that have been awarded at a loss will likely need to be resolved through bankruptcies, claims, and calls on the bond. For projects already in the pipeline, Design/Build may be one of the best options to cut cost (through efficiency).



About this author:
William Graves is the Vice President of Construction for Hessert Construction, a New Jersey based GC/CM firm. He has managed more than half a billion in new commercial construction and renovation projects. He is also a management consultant with Aeuqtias Management, MBFblueprint.com and blogs about construction at http://open.salon.com/blog/wjgraves.
bookmark tool image





Google Custom Search


This page is part of the Construction News & Articles section at GreatPossibilities.com.
All material on this website is copyright © of the author or original source unless specifically noted otherwise, and may not be used elsewhere without express permission from the author or original source.

  • SafeSurf Rated All Ages
  • Internet Content Rating Association
  • Valid XHTML 1.0 Strict